Tag Archives: eating
April 11, 2011 you, me, that rock with the lichen, and cucumber beetles : we’re all in this together
[ from a. addair who is listening to Keb' Mo' (Keb' Mo') ]
Some things I’ve been reading about :
“Many animals appear to have an instinctive aversion to genetically modified organisms (GMOs)…a farmer named Bill Lashmet performed a feeding experiment with his cows. He filled one trough with fifty pounds of genetically modified Bt corn (a corn that has been altered to make its own bacterial toxin) and the other trough with natural shelled corn. He watched as every single one of his cows sniffed the Bt corn, withdrew, and then moved on to the natural corn, which they devoured.”
“It is because of the known risks and all the uncertainty that some countries have banned the growing and selling of genetically engineered foods. Many residents of these countries are highly suspicious of GMOs and are especially watching American children to see if there are any long-term effects. The children of North America have now become the world’s lab animals on whom to study the long-term effects of eating GM products.”
“[Professor Michael Pollan] likens consumer choices to pulling single threads out of a garment. We pull a thread from the garment when we refuse to purchase eggs or meat from birds who were raised in confinement, whose beaks were clipped so they could never once taste their natural diet of worms and insects. We pull out a thread when we refuse to bring home a hormone-fattened turkey for Thanksgiving dinner. We pull a thread when we refuse to buy meat or dairy products from cows who were never allowed to chew grass, or breathe fresh air, or feel the sun warm their backs.”
“What you can do: Demand Labeling…The United States is one of the only industrial nations in the world that doesn’t demand that genetically altered foods be labeled.”
“What you can do: Focus on Grocers…Even if the government isn’t responsive to consumers’ demands, grocery stores have to be, since we can now take our business elsewhere.”
excerpts taken from Harvest for Hope by Jane Goodall
I hesitate to share what I’ve been reading because 1. this is old news to many 2. its offensive to others. But I decided to click “publish” because 1. reminders are helpful and 2. I’m interested in exploring why concepts in ecology are perceived as combative.
I think this is a matter of political marketing. We’re trained to camp at one of two ends of a spectrum, effectively making us inept problem-solvers.
The way I see it, eating should have nothing to do with whether you’re a democrat or republican. Food is such a basic need that it seems we should at least agree to put our power plays away while we make certain we can feed our bodies with whole, healthy, toxin-free food, if only to be able to fight another day.
Controversy is okay, but we should talk about it with an understanding of where our human institutions fit into a much larger picture. We made them up, they will not be around forever, and they aren’t worth defending to the point of cruelty and exploitation.
When it comes to the health of our environment (and consequently our health) the issues are just too basic to subject to our silly little games.